UK2000 Scenery Forum
May 21, 2013, 03:20:32 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: My FS setup  (Read 2896 times)
Gary Summons
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6564


« Reply #15 on: December 03, 2010, 08:47:25 AM »

Do you have a choose of input types?, (HDMI,VGA or DVI), some times a different input helps. What I have learnt  from then internet is nearly Everyone says to ovoid high sync TV.
Logged

Graham Biggs

Offline Offline

Posts: 210


« Reply #16 on: December 03, 2010, 12:58:35 PM »

My graphic card ATI HD4870has a DVI output but the TV only has the VGA (Blue) input for a connection, so I have to use a VGA adaptor on the graphic card end of the PC. Maybe that's the issue. Converting the digital out into analogue. I wonder why modern televisions don't have the DVI or maybe it's just my model.
Why do you mention, HDMI? My TV does have HDMI but PC's don't connect via HDMI do they? I learnt that when Googling the problem, I'm not the only person with the issue of sync loss with PC connection to TV. Not just Sony TVs either.
Logged

Gigabyte P35 DQ6. Intel Core 2 Extreme  3GHZ E6850. 2GB Corsair Dominator DDR2 1066 MHZ CL 5-5-5-15. ATI HD4870 1Gb. 2 X 150GB Western Digital Raptor 10,000Rpm. Ernamax Infiniti PSU 720W. XP SP2. 
Gary Summons
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6564


« Reply #17 on: December 04, 2010, 09:01:04 AM »

>HDMI? My TV does have HDMI but PC's don't connect via HDMI do they?

Yes they can Graham and many people use the HDMI output from there PC, HDMI is almost the same as a DVI. (HDMI has sound wires, DVI does not)

If your HD4870 has a HDMI port, then use that, I suspect yours doesn't. Just so you know the DVI output connector on your card is a Joint DVI and VGA output, you see many people think that when you use one of those DVI-VGA connector block it converts the signal,it doesn't do that. PC DVI connectors where design to carry Digital(DVI/HDMI) and  Analog (VGA). Some of pins in the DVI output also carry the analog VGA signal, the connector block simple takes these VGA pins and wires them to the VGA D shape connector end.


Now you could try a DVI-HDMI converter block, in which is take the digital pins and wires them to HDMI shaped end, that way your tely will get the Digital signal and may work better.

But this by no mean certain, I know a lot of tellys have trouble with PC outputs, I use to have 32inch telly that work fine when it dedected the PC, but every time I started the PC, the PC and telly did not know they were connected and had to 'force' connection manually, I gave up with that. When I purchased my current FS telly, I researched it very well, and heard from other users first.

There nothing directly wrong with using a VGA to VGA conection to a TV, this is what I use on mine, I do have a DVI and HDMI option (which also works), but my image is better using the VGA connections, it should not be like that but it is on mine!.

Logged

Graham Biggs

Offline Offline

Posts: 210


« Reply #18 on: December 04, 2010, 11:20:02 AM »


Now you could try a DVI-HDMI converter block, in which is take the digital pins and wires them to HDMI shaped end, that way your tely will get the Digital signal and may work better.

Thanks for your explanation Gary. I shall try using using a DVI-HDMI converter block like you suggested. I really had no idea that you could connect a PC to a TV this way using HDMI. As you say, it may or may not work for me but I'll try that.

Many thanks.

Logged

Gigabyte P35 DQ6. Intel Core 2 Extreme  3GHZ E6850. 2GB Corsair Dominator DDR2 1066 MHZ CL 5-5-5-15. ATI HD4870 1Gb. 2 X 150GB Western Digital Raptor 10,000Rpm. Ernamax Infiniti PSU 720W. XP SP2. 
Josh hall

Offline Offline

Posts: 51


« Reply #19 on: February 20, 2012, 08:12:10 PM »

Hi all, didn't no were to put this post so sorry in advance if there is a more appropriate place . I currently have a relatively poor pc when it comes to running fsx. I run 2 add ons ultimate traffic 2 and east midlands x I can only have 30% traffic on ut2 and want more traffic and add ons. I have found...
Processor   Intel Core i7-2600 (3.4 GHz, 2.0 DMI FSB, 8 MB L3 cache)
Operating System   Genuine Windows 7 Home Premium 64
RAM   8GB, DDR3, 10600MHz
Graphics card   NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti with PureVideo® HD technology
Hard drive   2 TB, 7200rpm, SATA 3G would this work well? I mean heathrow xtreme 100% ut2 traffic and so on... Thanks in advance Josh Grin
Logged
Neal Rogers

Offline Offline

Posts: 68


« Reply #20 on: February 20, 2012, 08:54:12 PM »

Yes Josh, that should work very well and is very similar to what a lot of us are using.

Try to get a good motherboard for overclocking purposes - you should then be able to drive your processor at a minimum of 4.4 GHz, which translates at about a 30% increase in frame rates.

You might want to consider having 2x1Gb hard disks instead so that scenery and airports have their own.

But budget for some software too - VFR Gen-X and Treescapes should be near the top of your list IMO.

Neal
Logged
Andrew Baker

Offline Offline

Posts: 353


« Reply #21 on: February 20, 2012, 09:02:03 PM »

The graphics card might be a bit on the slow side, go for a 560 Ti  minimum (570 is better yet) if you can and as suggested don't go for a Dell or other major brand that locks down the BIOS so you can't overclock. The i7 2600k still needs to be overclocked to get the best out of FSX, so leave a little extra in the budget for a better after market air cooler to give you more room to overclock. And yes 2 1Tb drives is better than 1 2Tb drive, one for the OS and the other for FSX.
Logged


Cheers,
Andy.
Christopher Low
BETA Tester
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1207


« Reply #22 on: February 20, 2012, 10:11:09 PM »

Josh,

Make sure that you get an i7 2600k CPU. That is the one that can be seriously overclocked.
Logged

Andrew Baker

Offline Offline

Posts: 353


« Reply #23 on: February 20, 2012, 10:17:52 PM »

The non K variant cant be overclocked at all, the K means it can be overclocked, same goes for the 2500 and 2700, if you want to overclock it, it has to be a 2x00k
Logged


Cheers,
Andy.
Josh hall

Offline Offline

Posts: 51


« Reply #24 on: February 20, 2012, 10:51:02 PM »

Hi all, thanks for you replys so quickly and very useful advice aswel!! A lot to look into and spend on but 'hey' who cares, its worth it! Just wondering Neal about your selection of Add ons: VFR Gen-X  I thought I got told that is mainly 2d and if you want the whole uk your looking over £100? And is Treescapes worth it? If you have them could you let me know what you think about them  Grin ?? Was thinking more on the line on ultimate terrain x and ground enviroment x or are they no were near as good and a bit cheap  Huh ? Anyone who knows any other great add ons really would like to know !!! Cheers again Josh
Logged
Neal Rogers

Offline Offline

Posts: 68


« Reply #25 on: February 20, 2012, 11:51:59 PM »

Josh -

Since we're on the UK2000 site I didn't bother to mention Gary's work  Grin You should of course buy VFR Airfields 1-3 and as many Extreme airports as you can afford.

VFR Gen-X - it is mainly 2D but makes such a difference if you fly VFR. You can turn off all the MS autogen buildings and trees and see the country as it really is (well, in the summer anyway). Adding Treescapes to this does IMO make a big difference, adding depth to the scenery, especially when flying below 3000 feet or so. Your £100 will only get you England and Wales though, and Treescapes is extra.

REX - is great at interpreting real world weather. Fab skies and clouds. I hear the weather engine isn't as good as some, but for me that's not a problem.

I don't have GEX or UTX so maybe someone else can comment on them.

Here are some images of the FSX approach to Gatwick (Extreme) with differing scenery for you to judge...

No Gen-X, No Treescapes, No Autogen:


No Gen-X, No Treescapes, Autogen:


Gen-X, No Treescapes, No Autogen:


Gen-X, Treescapes, No Autogen:


Neal
« Last Edit: February 21, 2012, 12:09:39 AM by Neal Rogers » Logged
Josh hall

Offline Offline

Posts: 51


« Reply #26 on: February 21, 2012, 07:52:53 AM »

Neal, thanks again for yor reply. I see now how good it looks but I would have to use treescapes with it couldn't bare with all 2d ! Think you have sold me, got to get my pc first tho!!  Tongue this might be a bit of a stupid question but is there an add on to add building to genx-x cause iam assuming Treescapes orngen-x doesn't do buildings?? of course I'll be getting as many as I can currently have east midlands, really want Gary to make Luton but that's not gunna happen for a while  Sad . If you go back to my ( future) specs would that run heathrow xtreme cause hear thats sometimes heavy on the fps and with 90-100% ut2 traffic??? Cheers Josh 
Logged
Christopher Low
BETA Tester
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1207


« Reply #27 on: February 21, 2012, 10:17:04 AM »

Josh,

The VFR GenX/Treescapes/UK2000 combo is unbeatable for the UK. As for autogen buildings, well....Darren at Earth Simulations is currently working on the AutoGenesis project, and the intention here is to cover the entire UK with realistic autogen buildings and trees. When this will be finished is anyone's guess, but it is the holy grail of flight simulation as far as I am concerned. The only problem with it that I can see would be memory issues when using high detail settings and a super detailed payware plane....
Logged

Josh hall

Offline Offline

Posts: 51


« Reply #28 on: February 21, 2012, 03:50:46 PM »

Hi, is vfr gen x and treescapes heavy on the fps Huh Thanks for your info Christopher , sorry if I sound abit thick about it, but all this scenery is all new to me!!  Grin cheers Josh
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.113 seconds with 18 queries.